Comment on “Adoption of Point-of-Use Chlorination for Household Drinking Water Treatment: A Systematic Review”
Abstract
Daniele Lantagne,1 Roberto Saltori,2 Esther Shaylor,3 Gabrielle String,4,5 Tracy Wise,6 Robert Quick,7 and Monica Ramos8 Feinstein International Center, Friedman School of Nutrition, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), New York, New York, USA Supply Division, UNICEF, Copenhagen, Denmark Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, USA Department of Community and Population Health, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, USA Office of Technical and Program Quality, U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) Bureau for Humanitarian Assistance, Washington, District of Columbia, USA Retired from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA Global WASH Cluster, UNICEF, Geneva, Switzerland
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Green Chemistry: A Framework for a Sustainable Future
- Nano/micro-plastic, an invisible threat getting into the brain
- Emerging contaminants antibiotic resistance genes and microplastics in the environment: Introduction to 21 review articles published in CREST during 2018–2022
- Water Resources and Sustainable Development
- Nano- and microplastics in the workplace
- Water Enclosure and World-Literature: New Perspectives on Hydro-Power and World-Ecology
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.