Evidence Hub

Gradual evolution of multiplexed spatial coding within a conserved hippocampal scaffold

Ge X, Deng C, Zou J, Hui Y, Ye Y, Long J, Xu Q, Duan Y et al.

2026

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The hippocampus constructs spatial maps for navigation, yet their format differs markedly across species. Whether divergences reflect ecological adaptation, phylogenetic architecture, or flexible coding strategy within a conserved circuit has been difficult to disentangle. We recorded CA1 in rats and tree shrews ( Tupaia belangeri chinensis ), a mammal phylogenetically and ecologically between rodents and primates, using identical tasks and analyses. Unlike the position-dominant code of rats, tree shrew CA1 exhibited a hybrid representation: weaker position selectivity, stronger non-positional tuning, and prevalent multiplexing approaching primate characteristics. Multiplexed populations decoded location as accurately as rat position populations while using fewer neurons, suggesting computational advantages of high-dimensional coding. Despite this representational shift, proximo-distal gradient, pattern completion, and global remapping persisted. Representational format can be tuned without altering the underlying circuit. Tree shrews occupy an evolutionary intermediate in which ancestral network dynamics are repurposed for efficient multiplexed coding, tracing a transition toward primate-like spatial representations.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a preprint, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free