Evidence Hub

AlphaGenome Atlas: in silico mutagenesis of the entire human genome improves prioritization and interpretation of non-coding variants

Lead authors:, Cheng J, Taylor KR, Nicolaisen L, Pan J, Bycroft C, Perino M, Ward T et al.

2026

Abstract

A major challenge in genomics is deciphering the functional consequences of non-coding genetic variation. Here we present AlphaGenome Atlas, a comprehensive resource that enables the joint interpretation and prioritization of variant effects across the entire human genome. Using AlphaGenome, we predicted the regulatory effects across thousands of molecular phenotypes for every possible human single nucleotide variant and many observed indels. These predictions were then used to derive a unified and interpretable AlphaGenome Variant Impact (AVI) score and to map cis-regulatory motifs across the genome. AVI achieved state-of-the-art performance across diverse benchmarks with improved prioritization of deleterious non-coding variants. Application of the combined Atlas resource helped solve an epileptic encephalopathy rare disease case, increased the statistical power to detect rare non-coding variants driving population-level phenotypes, and enhanced the mechanistic interpretation of these variants. Thus, AlphaGenome Atlas improves the prioritization and molecular interpretation of non-coding variants with genetic and clinical significance.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a preprint, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free