Evidence Hub

Naturally arising de novo open reading frames as potential zinc chelators in Drosophila melanogaster

Lee U

2026

Abstract

A central open problem in the study of de novo gene origination is that the molecular mechanisms and functions driving the emergence of such evolutionarily young, de novo protein-coding genes remain poorly understood. Metal chelation, a simple, directly selectable activity that both requires no specific interaction partners and is also compatible with intrinsic disorder, is one possible function. This possibility was tested using sequence signatures in 7,849 transcriptionally supported, still-segregating Drosophila melanogaster de novo open reading frames. Interestingly, these new open reading frames (neORFs) are enriched for bis-histidine motifs at the metal-coordination-competent spacings H-x-H and H-x-x-x-H and show no enrichment at the incompatible even spacings relative to repeat-masked intergenic ORFs. Notably, these neORFs were also found to lack the C-x-x-C grammar of canonical metal-binding proteins. I report that this H-x-H bis-histidine signal is generated by translation of (CA)ₙ microsatellites into His-Thr-His in Drosophila melanogaster, as evidenced by a CAC-codon bias within H-x-H motifs and a fourfold threonine enrichment at the central position. I propose that recurrent microsatellite expansion supplies Drosophila with a distributed, independently originated class of candidate metal-binding de novo peptides. I then trace one neORF (ZMEG) from conserved ancestral non-coding sequence to a transcribed, melanogaster-lineage open reading frame whose (CA)9-derived…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a preprint, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free