Neural multiplexing vs place coding: Multiplexing steps in when most needed
Abstract
Sensory scenes contain many different stimuli. Two complementary theories about how the brain segregates signals from different stimuli concern (a) time division multiplexing, such that neurons switch between encoding each item over time; and/or (b) place coding, such that different populations of neurons encode each item. Such time division multiplexing would appear to be required when the population of neurons responsive to each stimulus overlaps, as place coding lacks the granularity to resolve the two stimuli. This predicts that as responses to component stimuli become more similar, and thus less well resolved by place coding, there would be a greater incidence of multiplexing. We tested this hypothesis using single-unit responses in the macaque inferior colliculus to combinations of two sounds of varying center frequencies (given that sound frequency is place coded in this structure). We found that neurons were more likely to multiplex when their responses to each individual sound was more similar, differentiating signals whose neural representations would otherwise be less distinct. This finding supports the theory that neurons multiplex to maintain information about concurrent stimuli when place coding is insufficient to prevent largely overlapping responses in the neural population.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Regulation of nucleolus assembly by non-coding RNA polymerase II transcripts
- For a Healthy Histone Code, a Little SUMO in the Tail Keeps the Acetyl Away
- Discovering a binary CTCF code with a little help from BORIS
- Article Commentary: Stabilizing the Code–-Methods to Preserve RNA Prove Their Worth
- Foreword to the Special Issue for the RINTC (The Implicit Seismic Risk of Code-Conforming Structures) Project
- Commentary: Promoting Health and Well-being in Pediatric Primary Care Settings: Using Health and Behavior Codes at Routine Well-child Visits
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.