Evidence Hub

Rapid value learning reveals generalized and context-dependent codes in frontal cortex

Gutierrez E, Muller T, Butler J, Malalasekera WN, Hunt L, Veselic S, Kennerley S

2026

Abstract

Abstract Studying how the brain represents value spans distinct methods and training histories, from neuroimaging in task-naïve humans to single-neuron recordings in extensively trained non-human primates. Similar findings across fields have encouraged the untested assumption that rapidly emerging and overtrained value representations are equivalent. Here we recorded single-neuron activity in anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) as macaques learned novel cue values and chose between novel and overtrained cues. Value responses emerged within 4-7 cue presentations, matching behavioural adaptation. Yet ACC and OFC used distinct codes. ACC encoded value in a common format that generalised across training history. OFC coding was more context-dependent, with distinct subpopulations recruited by choice experience. Choice novelty was also encoded independently of value before chosen value signals emerged. During learning, ACC responses shifted from overtrained secondary reinforcers to newly predictive cues. These findings establish the necessary (rapid acquisition) and sufficient (generalised format) conditions for comparing value representations across methods, species, and training histories.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a preprint, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free