Evidence Hub

Mechanical Failure of Anterior Cervical Plate Systems: A Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Database Analysis

Jasti S, Batrash F, Farias MJ, Belanger J, Mahmoud T, Czerwein J, Kuris EO, Diebo BG et al.

2026

1,513 participants

Abstract

Abstract Purpose. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is among the most common spine procedures, and anterior plate fixation is central to many constructs. We characterized the mechanical failure modes reported for these devices and examined how each mode was distributed across injury and malfunction event coding. Methods. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database for anterior cervical plate systems (2010–2025). Reports were deduplicated, confirmed by structured narrative review, and classified into prespecified failure themes. Annual report volume was modeled by negative binomial regression with Mann-Kendall confirmation. Failure theme and event type were compared by chi-square test; injury-versus-malfunction odds ratios (ORs) came from Fisher’s exact tests. Results. Of the 5,077 reports, 4,775 (94.1%) were assigned a primary failure theme, and 302 (5.9%) remained unclassified. Among classified reports, the most common primary failure themes were screw backout or loosening (n = 1,513; 31.7%), locking-mechanism failure (n = 1,052; 22.0%), and screw breakage (n = 920; 19.3%). Injury coding was most associated with subsidence/nonunion (OR 7.74), revision or removal (OR 3.70), migration or displacement (OR 2.72), and dysphagia/esophageal complications (OR 2.37). Death-coded reports were uncommon and reflected perioperative complications rather than mechanical failure. Conclusion. Subsidence or…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 1,513 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free