Effect of Ivabradine on Microcirculation and Cardiac Output in Patients Diagnosed With Septic Shock (Open-label Randomized Controlled Study)
Abstract
Persistent tachycardia in sepsis or multi-organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) is an ominous sign. This usually comes under control with judicious use of antibiotics, fluid resuscitation, sedation. Uncontrolled tachycardia in systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis deprives the heart muscle of oxygen. As it progresses, insufficient heart muscle nutrition eventually leads to myocardial dysfunction. It can also present as heart failure. In acute coronary syndromes, beta blockers are used to control heart rate. However in MODS, it cannot be used due to hemodynamic instability and worsened myocardial function.
Sinoatrial (SA) myocytes are the pacemaker cells in the heart. Pacemaker activity involves several ionic currents that influences spontaneous depolarization of SA node including I(f) current. The word I(f) means funny, because this current has unusual properties as compared with other currents known at the time of its discovery. It is one of the most important ionic current for regulating pacemaker activity in SA node.
Ivabradine is an I(f) current inhibitor in SA node. Currently, it is the only agent shown to clinically lower heart rate with no negative inotropism or effects on conduction and contractility.so usage of Ivabradine to control tachycardia in patients with septic shock may help to improve myocardial filling and cardiac output.
Marcos L.Miranda et al. found that Ivabradine was effective in reducing microvascular derangements evoked by experimental…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 44 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Regulation of nucleolus assembly by non-coding RNA polymerase II transcripts
- For a Healthy Histone Code, a Little SUMO in the Tail Keeps the Acetyl Away
- Discovering a binary CTCF code with a little help from BORIS
- Article Commentary: Stabilizing the Code–-Methods to Preserve RNA Prove Their Worth
- Foreword to the Special Issue for the RINTC (The Implicit Seismic Risk of Code-Conforming Structures) Project
- Commentary: Promoting Health and Well-being in Pediatric Primary Care Settings: Using Health and Behavior Codes at Routine Well-child Visits
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.