A Proof of Concept Study to Evaluate the Use of Metabonomics and Lipidomics in Predicting Toxicity and Efficacy of Anti-VEGF Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to assess whether certain metabonomics and/or lipidomics features in correlation with pharmacokinetics before, during and after treatment with sunitinib or pazopanib in first line can predict toxicity and efficacy of sunitinib or pazopanib in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients.
Conditions: Clear-cell Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Primary outcome: Treatment assessment by using RECIST 1.1 and adverse events will be documented using the NCI-CTC coding system (version 4.0).
Enrollment: 90 participants.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 90 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Regulation of nucleolus assembly by non-coding RNA polymerase II transcripts
- For a Healthy Histone Code, a Little SUMO in the Tail Keeps the Acetyl Away
- Discovering a binary CTCF code with a little help from BORIS
- Article Commentary: Stabilizing the Code–-Methods to Preserve RNA Prove Their Worth
- Foreword to the Special Issue for the RINTC (The Implicit Seismic Risk of Code-Conforming Structures) Project
- Commentary: Promoting Health and Well-being in Pediatric Primary Care Settings: Using Health and Behavior Codes at Routine Well-child Visits
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.