Evidence Hub

Real-World, Multicenter Evaluation of the Incidence and Risk Factors for Non-susceptible Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Isolates

B. Jones, Jamie L. Wagner, D. Chastain, P. Bookstaver, K. Stover, Jason Lin, Hannah Matson, Noah White et al.

Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance, 2022

325 participants · 16 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a cause of infection most commonly in the opportunistic host. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and levofloxacin are considered first line treatment agents. With reports of increasing resistance to these first line agents it is important to determine risk factors associated with a non-susceptible isolate.

METHODS

This was a real-world, multicenter, retrospective case-control study from five centers in the southeast United States evaluating S. maltophilia. The primary outcome was risk factors associated with non-susceptibility of S. maltophilia isolates to ≥1 antimicrobial agent. Secondary outcomes include incidence of S. maltophilia non-susceptibility, all-cause mortality, and 30-day readmission rates.

RESULTS

There were 325 patients included in the study. For the primary outcome, the only factor associated with non-susceptibility per univariate analysis was isolation from urine culture (13.3% vs. 5.4%; p=0.014); while presence of mechanical ventilation (37.7% vs. 21.5%) and ICU admission (35.3% vs. 18.4%) were associated with susceptibility (p<0.001). For the secondary outcomes, non-susceptibility was present in 49% of isolates with 43/325 (13.2%), 53/324 (16.4%), and 105/172 (61%) to TMP-SMX, levofloxacin, and ceftazidime, respectively. Resistance to chloramphenicol and tigecycline was observed among 5/26 and 11/16 of tested isolates, respectively. Sixty-six patients (20%) experienced all-cause, inpatient mortality (18% susceptible…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 325 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free