Evidence Hub

Non-Coding RNAs in Diagnostic Pathology of High-Grade Central Osteosarcoma

Roessner A, Franke S, Schreier J, Ullmann SR, Karras FS

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025

Abstract

A histological evaluation remains the cornerstone of diagnosing highly malignant osteosarcoma, having demonstrated its efficacy and reliability over several decades. However, despite these advancements, misdiagnoses with severe consequences, including inadequate surgical procedures, continue to occur. Consequently, there is a pressing need to further enhance diagnostic security. Adjunct immunohistochemical approaches have demonstrated significant effectiveness in regard to cancer diagnostics, generally. However, their utility for identifying highly malignant osteosarcoma is limited. Molecular genetic findings have significantly improved the diagnosis of Ewing's sarcoma by identifying specific translocations and have been used to detect specific IDH gene mutations in chondrosarcoma. Nevertheless, molecular genetic alterations in highly malignant osteosarcoma exhibit a high degree of complexity, thereby limiting their diagnostic utility. Given that only 1-2% of the human genome comprises protein-coding sequences, the growing number of non-coding regulatory RNAs, which are increasingly being elucidated, has garnered substantial attention in the field of clinical cancer diagnostics. Over the past several years, patterns of altered non-coding RNA expression have been identified that facilitate the distinction between benign and malignant tumors in various organs. In the field of bone tumors, the experience of this approach has been limited thus far. The divergent expression of…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free