Insight and executive functions in acquired brain injury: empirical evidence and theoretical frameworks
Abstract
Impaired self-awareness affects 30-50% of patients with moderate to severe acquired brain injury (ABI) and represents one of the most clinically consequential obstacles to effective rehabilitation. Despite substantial evidence that self-awareness and executive functions share neural substrates in prefrontal cortex, the mechanisms linking these two functions remain incompletely specified. This paper reviews the empirical evidence for the relationship between executive functions and insight in ABI, and evaluates four theoretical frameworks: the Cognitive Awareness Model, the Dynamic Comprehensive Model of Awareness, Mograbi et al.'s predictive coding framework, and Duncan's adaptive coding model. It then proposes a novel integration of the latter two as a mechanistically grounded account of why executive dysfunction and impaired self-awareness co-occur following prefrontal damage. We argue that adaptive coding describes the representational flexibility of prefrontal neurons in coding self-relevant information, whilst predictive coding provides the computational logic, driven by precision-weighted prediction errors, through which this adaptive selection is updated. We conclude by discussing assessment and rehabilitation implications in ABI.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Regulation of nucleolus assembly by non-coding RNA polymerase II transcripts
- For a Healthy Histone Code, a Little SUMO in the Tail Keeps the Acetyl Away
- Discovering a binary CTCF code with a little help from BORIS
- Article Commentary: Stabilizing the Code–-Methods to Preserve RNA Prove Their Worth
- Foreword to the Special Issue for the RINTC (The Implicit Seismic Risk of Code-Conforming Structures) Project
- Commentary: Promoting Health and Well-being in Pediatric Primary Care Settings: Using Health and Behavior Codes at Routine Well-child Visits
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.