Recent advances in the detection and functional analysis of circRNAs with short-read RNA sequencing-based methods
Abstract
Circular RNAs (circRNAs) were first identified approximately 50 years ago in pathogenic viroids as single-stranded, covalently closed RNA molecules. Initially considered by-products of splicing, circRNAs are now recognised as an important class of regulatory RNAs involved in microRNA sponging, RNA-protein interactions, and cellular pathways. Their closed-loop structure, generated through backsplicing, confers resistance to exonucleolytic degradation and contributes to their stability. Owing to their tissue- and disease-specific expression, circRNAs have emerged as promising biomarkers for cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, and cardiovascular disease. Over the past decade, numerous bioinformatics tools utilising RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) data have been developed for circRNA detection and analysis. Detection methods have evolved from manual split-read inspection to automated identification of the back spliced junction, while annotation pipelines now resolve the genomic origins and structural characteristics of circRNAs. Because individual circRNA callers vary considerably in sensitivity and specificity, a combined usage of tools in circRNA detection has become the preferred strategy for generating high-confidence datasets. Beyond their non-coding functions, increasing evidence suggests that some circRNAs possess protein-coding potential through open reading frames, cap-independent translation mechanisms, internal ribosome entry sites (IRESs), and N6-methyladenosine…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a review, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Regulation of nucleolus assembly by non-coding RNA polymerase II transcripts
- For a Healthy Histone Code, a Little SUMO in the Tail Keeps the Acetyl Away
- Discovering a binary CTCF code with a little help from BORIS
- Article Commentary: Stabilizing the Code–-Methods to Preserve RNA Prove Their Worth
- Foreword to the Special Issue for the RINTC (The Implicit Seismic Risk of Code-Conforming Structures) Project
- Commentary: Promoting Health and Well-being in Pediatric Primary Care Settings: Using Health and Behavior Codes at Routine Well-child Visits
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.