Evidence Hub

Phenotypic and genotypic analysis of Helicobacter pylori resistance patterns, molecular characteristics, and CYP2C19 polymorphisms in Nanjing: a retrospective cross-sectional study

Hao-Cheng Wang, Chao Li, Ruo-Lin Peng, Xiujuan Wang, Jiahuan Gao, Zhen-Yu Zhang

Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 2026

7,227 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The continued rise in antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) poses a major challenge to clinical eradication therapy. The resistance patterns and phenotype-genotype concordance of H. pylori in the Nanjing region have not been systematically reported in recent years.

METHODS: Data from 7227 enrolled patients at Nanjing First Hospital (2018-2024) were retrospectively analyzed. Among these, 5729 patients were culture-positive for H. pylori and underwent phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing for six antibiotics. Genotypic testing for resistance-associated mutations was performed on a subset of these patients. The remaining 1498 patients, although H. pylori-positive by other diagnostic methods, were culture-negative and were excluded from resistance analyses.

RESULTS: Metronidazole showed the highest resistance rate at 84.45% (4838/5729, 95% CI: 83.50-85.37), followed by clarithromycin at 50.01% (2865/5729, 95% CI: 48.71-51.31) and levofloxacin at 38.59% (2211/5729, 95% CI: 37.33-39.87). Resistance rates to amoxicillin at 0.51% (29/5729, 95% CI: 0.34-0.73), furazolidone at 0.19% (11/5729, 95% CI: 0.10-0.34), and tetracycline at 0.07% (4/5729, 95% CI: 0.02-0.18) were very low. Annual trend analysis showed that the metronidazole resistance rate remained above 92% since 2020, reaching 98.68% in 2024. Clarithromycin resistance increased from 35.80% to 60.14% and then declined slightly, while levofloxacin resistance rose from 20.99% to 44.59%…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 7,227 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free