Social buffering of stress in rats: a multisystem meta-analysis and translational framework for stress resilience
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Social context modulates stress physiology and resilience, yet preclinical rat paradigms vary widely in stressor type, timing of social exposure, contact modality, and endpoint definitions. We synthesized rat studies to quantify directional and, where feasible, standardized effect-size evidence for social buffering and to outline translational implications.
METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched (2008-2025) for in vivo rat studies comparing conspecific (pair/group housing or conspecific presence) versus solitary conditions across validated stress and PTSD-like paradigms (e.g., fear conditioning/extinction, CUS/CMS, social defeat, predator threat). Data extraction and reporting followed PRISMA 2020 and SYRCLE guidance. Synthesis followed a two-tier approach: (i) all eligible contrasts were direction-coded as beneficial, neutral/mixed, or detrimental under conspecific conditions based strictly on reported statistical contrasts; and (ii) for domains with sufficient coded contrasts, the proportion of beneficial comparisons was estimated with exact binomial tests and 95% confidence intervals. Standardized mean-difference meta-analysis (Hedges' g; random-effects REML) was conducted only for predefined outcomes with adequate numerical reporting.
RESULTS: Forty studies met inclusion criteria, yielding 89 extracted comparisons. Overall, 69/89 comparisons (≈78%) favored conspecific conditions. Domain-level directional syntheses supported predominance of…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Regulation of nucleolus assembly by non-coding RNA polymerase II transcripts
- For a Healthy Histone Code, a Little SUMO in the Tail Keeps the Acetyl Away
- Discovering a binary CTCF code with a little help from BORIS
- Article Commentary: Stabilizing the Code–-Methods to Preserve RNA Prove Their Worth
- Foreword to the Special Issue for the RINTC (The Implicit Seismic Risk of Code-Conforming Structures) Project
- Commentary: Promoting Health and Well-being in Pediatric Primary Care Settings: Using Health and Behavior Codes at Routine Well-child Visits
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.