Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Mismatch Negativity in Autism: Insights Into Predictive Mechanisms
Abstract
Mismatch negativity (MMN) has been frequently used to assess auditory processing and change detection in autism spectrum disorder (ASD), but findings have been fairly inconsistent. To address this issue, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of MMN amplitude (76 effect sizes) and latency (62 effect sizes) in ASD to identify factors contributing to this heterogeneity and to interpret findings within the predictive coding framework. While residual heterogeneity remained, significant effects of the interaction between age group and design type (unifeature vs. multifeature, i.e., one or several types of deviants) and deviant type were found for MMN amplitude. In multifeature designs, autistic children and adolescents exhibited reduced MMN amplitudes compared to neurotypical peers (g = 0.25, p = 0.01), whereas autistic adults showed increased MMN amplitudes (g = -0.26, p = 0.02). In addition, autistic individuals had significantly smaller MMN amplitudes than neurotypical individuals in paradigms using phoneme deviants (g = 0.41, p < 0.001). Across designs, no significant MMN latency differences were observed between neurotypical and autistic individuals. These results are discussed within the predictive coding framework, as MMN responses are thought to reflect prediction errors, aligning with theories suggesting heightened prediction errors in autistic adults. Future studies with larger samples and improved data reporting are needed to further clarify the…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Regulation of nucleolus assembly by non-coding RNA polymerase II transcripts
- For a Healthy Histone Code, a Little SUMO in the Tail Keeps the Acetyl Away
- Discovering a binary CTCF code with a little help from BORIS
- Article Commentary: Stabilizing the Code–-Methods to Preserve RNA Prove Their Worth
- Foreword to the Special Issue for the RINTC (The Implicit Seismic Risk of Code-Conforming Structures) Project
- Commentary: Promoting Health and Well-being in Pediatric Primary Care Settings: Using Health and Behavior Codes at Routine Well-child Visits
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.