Evidence Hub

The burden of rare damaging variants in hereditary atypical parkinsonism genes is increased in patients with Parkinson's disease

Kim YJ, Lee J, Kim NY, Hong S, Cho YS, Yoon J

Neurobiology of aging, 2021

Abstract

Increased burdens of rare coding variants in genes related to lysosomal storage disease or mitochondrial pathways were reported to be associated with idiopathic Parkinson's disease. Under a hypothesis that the burden of damaging rare coding variants is increased in causative genes for hereditary parkinsonism, we analyzed the burdens of rare coding variants with a case-control design. Two cohorts of whole-exome sequencing data and a cohort of genome-wide genotyping data of clinically validated idiopathic Parkinson's disease cases and controls, which were open to the public, were used. The sequence kernel association test-optimal was used to analyze the burden of rare variants in the hereditary parkinsonism gene set, which was constructed from the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man database through manual curation. The hereditary parkinsonism gene set consisted of 17 genes with a locus symbol prefix for familial Parkinson's disease and 75 hereditary atypical parkinsonism genes. We detected a significant association of enriched burdens of predicted damaging rare coding variants in hereditary parkinsonism genes in all three datasets. Meta-analyses of the rare variant burden test in a subgroup of gene sets revealed an association between burdens of rare damaging variants with PD in a hereditary atypical parkinsonism gene set, but not in a subgroup gene set with a locus symbol prefix for familial Parkinson's disease. Our results highlight the roles of rare damaging variants in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free