Evidence Hub

Beyond Perceptions: Meta-Analyses on Observed Parent-Child Interaction Behaviors and Childhood and Adolescent Depression

Wentholt WGM, Molendijk ML, Janssen LHC, van Houtum LAEM, Tollenaar MS, Alink LRA, Elzinga BM

Clinical child and family psychology review, 2026

Abstract

A lack of positive and the presence of negative parenting are frequently mentioned as risk factors for the development and maintenance of childhood and adolescent depression. However, meta-analytic research is mostly based on parenting as perceived by the child or parent, with the potential risk of a reporter bias. Also, specific patterns of observed child behavior among children with childhood depression are often overlooked and there currently is no meta-analysis on this topic. The current meta-analyses integrate the cross-sectional and longitudinal relation between observed parenting and childhood depression, and the cross-sectional relation between observed child behavior and childhood depression. This preregistered study (k = 90) includes 350 effect sizes on five observed parenting behaviors and 131 effect sizes on six observed child behaviors in parent-child interactions that were found via PsychINFO, Web of Science, and Proquest Dissertations and Theses (until the end of September 2024). Multilevel meta-analyses show that parental warmth/support and harsh control/criticism co-occur with and precede childhood depression, with small effect sizes, while childhood depression generally did not precede negative parenting. This aligns with previous research based on subjective reports, indicating that low parental warmth and higher criticism may form risk factors for childhood depression. Observed parental autonomy granting, guidance/structure, and parental depressed affect…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free