Evidence Hub

Helping hands, flourishing hearts: A meta-analytic study of organizational citizenship behaviors and subjective well-being

Wiese CW, Scotney VS, Hou DX, Tay L

Applied psychology. Health and well-being, 2026

29,034 participants

Abstract

Does going the extra mile at work enhance an employee's well-being, or does it come with hidden costs? With these two diverging perspectives on the impact of Organizational Citizenship Behaviors (OCBs) on employee well-being and inconclusive previous meta-analytic findings, the current study provides a much-needed update. We conducted a meta-analysis (k = 186, n = 29,034) on the relationship between OCBs and Subjective Well-Being (positive affect, negative affect, life satisfaction) to provide updated estimates of the cross-sectional effects and the first meta-analytic evidence of longitudinal and within-person effects. We also explore critical moderators (age, gender, affective context (work vs. general), and OCB type (individual vs. organizational)). Cross-sectional findings reveal significant associations between OCBs and positive affect (ρ = .34), negative affect (ρ = -.11), and life satisfaction (ρ = .30). Notably, only negative affect correlates differently with different OCB types. Consistent with research on gender role expectations, females experience lower life satisfaction from OCBs than males. Longitudinal findings show that positive and negative affect predict future OCBs; however, limited studies examine the reverse causal direction. On a daily level, positive affect is associated with higher levels of OCBs, whereas negative affect is not associated with OCBs. When examining specific OCB types, negative affect is associated with greater engagement in OCB-Is. An…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 29,034 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free