Evidence Hub

Diagnostic accuracy of circulating long noncoding RNAs in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Babajani N, Saeedian B, Shirmard FO, Pourfaraji SM, Jodeiri F, Delavari A, Taheri E

BMC gastroenterology, 2026

6,000 participants

Abstract

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, largely due to late diagnosis and the limited sensitivity of current screening biomarkers such as alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). Circulating long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have recently emerged as promising, noninvasive biomarkers that may reflect the molecular mechanisms underlying hepatocarcinogenesis. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of circulating lncRNAs for detecting HCC.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase was performed up to March 2025 following the PRISMA-DTA guidelines. Eligible studies reporting the diagnostic performance of circulating lncRNAs for HCC were included. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated using a bivariate random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to sample type, detection method, and reference standard.

Results: Eighty-one studies encompassing over 6,000 participants were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of circulating lncRNAs were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.80-0.86) and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.75-0.84), respectively, with an area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve of 0.88. Serum-based assays showed slightly higher accuracy than plasma-based assays. lncRNAs also demonstrated good diagnostic performance in discriminating HCC from cirrhotic patients, as well…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 6,000 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free