Evidence Hub

Artificial intelligence and academic anxiety? a meta-analysis

Wang W, Diao L, Yu J

BMC psychology, 2026

Abstract

Background: Academic anxiety negatively impacts students' performance and well-being. Although AI technologies are increasingly used in education, findings on their effectiveness in reducing academic anxiety remain mixed.

Objective: This meta-analysis quantified the overall effect of AI interventions on academic anxiety and identified potential moderators.

Methods: A systematic search identified 22 studies with 30 independent effect sizes. Robust variance estimation with random-effects models was used. Subgroup analyses and Q-tests were conducted.

Results: AI interventions showed a significant moderate overall effect on reducing academic anxiety (g = - 0.65, 95% CI [- 1.07, - 0.22], p 0.05), indicating observed differences are descriptive rather than statistically robust.

Conclusion: AI interventions significantly reduce academic anxiety with a moderate effect size. Although efficacy varies descriptively across several factors, most subgroup differences are not statistically significant. Future research should employ rigorous experimental designs, longer follow‑ups, and meta‑analytic structural equation modeling to test underlying mechanisms.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free