Evidence Hub

Diagnostic accuracy of non-coding RNA for detecting endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Mohammadi SD, Keshtkar A, Moini A, Rastegar T, Heydarikhah F, Shafie A, Ghasemi M, Berenji HG

Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Endometriosis diagnosis currently relies on invasive laparoscopy, creating a need for non-invasive alternatives. This study evaluates microRNAs (miRNAs) as potential diagnostic biomarkers for endometriosis through systematic evidence synthesis and performance analysis.

METHODS: We systematically reviewed studies (1992-2025) from seven databases (Pub-Med/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, etc.) using endometriosis- and ncRNA-related keywords.

INCLUDED STUDIES: (1) used qRT-PCR for miRNA/lncRNA detection, (2) con-firmed endometriosis via laparoscopy, and (3) provided data to construct 2 × 2 contingency tables. All human biospecimens were eligible; no restrictions were applied to study design or language. Exclusions included non-RNA biomarkers or non-PCR methods. QUADAS-1 assessed methodological quality. To avoid multiplicity, diagnostic accuracy metrics (sensitivity, specificity) were calculated and synthesized separately for each biomarker. Evidence certainty was evaluated with GRADE.

RESULTS: Among 28 qualifying studies (most with QUADAS-1 scores ≥7), mir-8 showed optimal accuracy (sensitivity: 94.8 %, 95 % CI 58.0-99.6 %; specificity: 91.9 %, 95 % CI 71.7-98.1 %) with favorable likelihood ratios (PLR > 5, NLR 90 %). mir - 122 demonstrated more consistent performance with narrower confidence intervals.

CONCLUSIONS: While mir-8 exhibits superior diagnostic accuracy, mir - 122 expression must be validated in a patient cohort to underline its clinical utility.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free