Evidence Hub

Genome wide association study meta-analysis of neuropathologic lesions of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias in a multi-site autopsy cohort

Cholerton B, Godrich D, Pasteris J, Rivero J, Martin ER, Kunkle BW, Naj AC, Hamilton-Nelson KL et al.

PLoS genetics, 2026

12,509 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Understanding the genetic foundations of dementia is critical to unraveling its complex molecular basis. Given that a clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia often results from interplay between multiple underlying neuropathologic co-morbidities, previous genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of clinically diagnosed AD are restricted in their ability to translate genetic associations to potential targeted therapeutics. The current study seeks to address these limitations by presenting the largest GWAS to date (n = 12,509) of neuropathologic hallmarks of AD and AD related dementias (ADRDs). We further performed a candidate-variant analysis using loci previously identified in GWAS of clinically diagnosed AD dementia and Parkinson's disease (PD). Finally, we conducted heritability and genetic correlation analyses using linkage disequilibrium (LD) score regression. We found broad genome-wide significant associations with APOE across AD and ADRDs but not cerebrovascular disease and vascular brain injury. We further identified 12 significant loci across 10 neuropathologic phenotypes, including 5 loci previously implicated in GWAS of clinical AD and ADRDs (variants on BIN1, PICALM/ EED, TMEM106B, GRN, and SNCA/ SNCA-AS1) and 7 novel genome-wide associations (variants on EPHA5, PSMG1, LINC00276, VAPA, LINC00290, DOCK4 and SLAIN2/ SLC10A4). Our analysis of AD and PD clinical candidate variants demonstrated several that were associated with AD neuropathologic change…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 12,509 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free