Evidence Hub

Multi-layered functional genomics prioritizes candidate effectors and regulatory mechanisms of ankylosing spondylitis

Meng F, Chen L, Li M, Zhang Q, Wang P, Lin R, Liu J, Yuan Z et al.

Frontiers in immunology, 2026

Abstract

Background: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory arthropathy with heritability estimated at approximately 90%, yet the effector genes and regulatory mechanisms beyond the well-established HLA-B*27 association remain incompletely defined. Translating GWAS-identified loci into biological insight requires integration of calibrated association statistics, gene-level prioritization, fine-mapping, molecular prediction, and experimental follow-up.

Methods: We performed a GWAS meta-analysis of 7,551 AS cases and 1,258,581 controls from the Million Veteran Program, FinnGen, and UK Biobank whole-genome sequencing cohorts. The post-GWAS analysis combined causal transcriptome-wide association study (cTWAS) across four immune-relevant tissues, colocalization, four-method fine-mapping, Geneformer V2 in-silico perturbation, AlphaGenome variant-effect prediction, cross-trait LD-score regression (LDSC), pathway enrichment, structured druggability assessment, and siRNA knockdown in Jurkat T cells. We added LDSC calibration, per-cohort Q-Q plots, heterogeneity summaries, and leave-one-cohort-out sensitivity analyzes for revised quality control.

Results: The meta-analysis identified 30 genome-wide significant loci harboring 26,178 significant variants. After LDSC-compatible quality control, the meta-analysis showed lambda_GC = 1.09, LDSC intercept = 1.045 (SE = 0.009), and attenuation ratio = 0.365 (SE = 0.075); per-cohort lambda_GC values were 1.027, 1.080, and 1.018 for MVP,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free