Evidence Hub

LncRNAs as Emerging Diagnostic Biomarkers for Cardiovascular Diseases: Evidence Synthesis Through Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Zhu B, Liang Y

Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

BackgroundCardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of global morbidity and mortality. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have emerged as potential diagnostic biomarkers for CVDs.AimTo systematically evaluate the diagnostic value of lncRNAs for CVDs through a systematic review and meta-analysis.MethodsStudies focusing on lncRNAs as diagnostic markers for CVDs were searched from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. The meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The diagnostic value of lncRNAs was calculated by pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve (AUC). Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed to explore heterogeneity sources. Publication bias and sensitivity analysis were also conducted.ResultsA total of 16 articles (18 lncRNAs, 1125 controls, and 1855 cases) were included. LncRNAs showed pooled sensitivity of 0.81 (95% CI = 0.76-0.85) and specificity of 0.86 (95% CI = 0.80-0.90) for CVDs diagnosis. The SROC analysis revealed an AUC of 0.90 (95% CI = 0.87-0.92), indicating high diagnostic accuracy. The positive diagnostic likelihood ratio (DLR) was 5.73 (95% CI =4.07-8.08), and the negative DLR was 0.22 (95% CI = 0.18-0.28). The diagnostic score was 3.25 (95% CI = 2.79-3.71), the diagnostic odds ratio was 25.77 (95% CI = 16.22-40.93). The expression trend of lncRNAs, control type, and disease type were the main sources of heterogeneity.ConclusionLncRNAs…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free