Mitochondrial DNA mutations in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cause approximately 95% of head and neck malignancies. Clinicopathological predictions are limited, and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations have emerged as possible biomarkers. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify the relative contributions of several mitochondrial genome regions to the overall mutational burden in HNSCC, thereby contextualizing their potential biological importance.
Materials and methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the PRISMA criteria. PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched up to May 2025. Eligible studies reporting somatic mtDNA mutations in HNSCC were included. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools. Proportional meta-analyses under random-effects models determined pooled mutation shares for six mtDNA regions.
Results: Seventeen studies were included. The D-loop was the major hotspot (67%, 95% CI: 0.28-0.91; I2 = 93.2%). ND mutations represented 29% (95% CI: 0.20-0.40), predominantly in ND1, ND2, ND4, ND5, and ND4L. COX (12%), rRNA (13%), and tRNA (9%) mutations contributed variably, while CYTB mutations were less frequent but constant (8%, I2 = 0%). Considerable heterogeneity was seen in most regions.
Conclusion: The D-loop and ND genes dominate the mutational spectrum of HNSCC. While these findings highlight recurrent alternations in mtDNA,…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Regulation of nucleolus assembly by non-coding RNA polymerase II transcripts
- For a Healthy Histone Code, a Little SUMO in the Tail Keeps the Acetyl Away
- Discovering a binary CTCF code with a little help from BORIS
- Article Commentary: Stabilizing the Code–-Methods to Preserve RNA Prove Their Worth
- Foreword to the Special Issue for the RINTC (The Implicit Seismic Risk of Code-Conforming Structures) Project
- Commentary: Promoting Health and Well-being in Pediatric Primary Care Settings: Using Health and Behavior Codes at Routine Well-child Visits
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.