Evidence Hub

Identifying effective behavior change techniques in interventions for enhancing the implementation of school-based policies and/or practices to prevent chronic disease in students: a secondary analysis of a systematic review

Lee DCW, O'Brien KM, Presseau J, Yoong S, McCrabb S, McDiarmid K, Lecathelinais C, Wolfenden L et al.

Translational behavioral medicine, 2026

Abstract

Background: School-based interventions improve healthy eating, physical activity, and reduce tobacco, and/or alcohol use in students. While strategies supporting their implementation have been found effective, a comprehensive understanding of the active ingredients [e.g. behavior change techniques (BCTs)] remains unclear.

Purpose: To describe and examine which BCTs within implementation strategies are associated with increased implementation of school-based interventions targeting healthy eating, physical activity, tobacco, and/or alcohol use in students aged 5-18.

Methods: A secondary analysis was conducted on 39 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from a 2024 Cochrane review. Individual BCTs within implementation strategies were coded using the BCT taxonomy v1 and mapped to the Behavior Change Technique Ontology (BCTO). Mode of delivery, setting, and source were coded. Meta-regressions using random-effect models assessed the associations between identified BCTs (at the highest level of aggregation of the BCTO) and effective implementation of policies and/or practice (e.g. number of curriculum lessons taught).

Results: Eighty-four independent BCTs were identified and meta-regression analysis revealed that out of 14 highest level of aggregation BCTs, "Associative learning" (e.g. Prompt intended action) had a statistically significant association with increased implementation (standard mean difference 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.08, 1.72; 30 trials), which were primarily…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free