Evidence Hub

Assessing the Effectiveness, Adherence and Attrition of Smartphone-Based Mental Health Interventions in University Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Jabs M, Thompson M, Linardon J, Messer M, Wade TD

Early intervention in psychiatry, 2026

Abstract

Background: Mental health challenges are prevalent among university students, many of whom face barriers to accessing traditional psychological services. Smartphone-delivered mental health applications offer a scalable intervention option, but evidence regarding their effectiveness and engagement remains limited. This systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis examined clinical and engagement outcomes of app-based mental health interventions in university students.

Method: Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global and Scopus were searched from inception to 27 October 2025 (initial search: 2 April 2025). Randomised controlled trials were synthesised using multilevel meta-analysis and non-randomised designs were narratively synthesised. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Outcomes included depression, anxiety, stress, well-being, disordered eating and body image, alongside attrition and adherence.

Results: A total of k = 122 studies were included. Interventions produced significant effects across all outcomes: anxiety (d = 0.22, 95% CI [0.14, 0.30]), depression (d = 0.25, 95% CI [0.16, 0.33]), stress (d = 0.28, 95% CI [0.19, 0.38]), well-being (d = 0.47, 95% CI [0.16, 0.78]), disordered eating (d = 0.29, 95% CI [0.06, 0.52]) and body image (d = 0.27, 95% CI [0.06, 0.48]). Substantial heterogeneity was observed for most outcomes. Attrition was moderate (17.0%, 95% CI [13.5, 21.2]) and adherence varied (70.0%, 95% CI [54.0,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free