Evidence Hub

High expression of long non-coding RNA NEAT1 indicates poor prognosis of human cancer

Jian Fang, Fuhao Qiao, Jing-Kai Tu, Jinfeng Xu, Fangfang Ding, Yun Liu, Bufugdi Andreas Akuo, Jian-Peng Hu et al.

OncoTarget, 2017

1,496 participants · 42 citations

Abstract

The nuclear paraspeckle assembly transcript 1 (NEAT1) is a long non-coding RNA. Many studies have reported that NEAT1 plays critical oncogenic roles and facilitates tumorigenesis of various human cancers. High NEAT1 expression is associated with a poor prognosis in cancer patients. This meta-analysis was conducted to assess the association between NEAT1 levels and survival times of cancer patients. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. Thirteen publications with 1,496 cancer patients from 5 databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Wiley Online Library, and Medline) met the criteria for this meta-analysis. Results of the analysis showed that NEAT1 expression in human cancer was significantly associated with OS (hazard ratio [HR]=1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.39–1.68), including digestive system tumor (HR=1.54, 95% CI: 1.37–1.73) and respiratory carcinomas (HR=1.44, 95% CI: 1.11–1.85). The results also indicated that NEAT1 expression was highly associated with tumor size (>3 cm vs. ≤3 cm; odds ratio [OR]=2.51, 95% CI: 1.27–4.99; p=0.009), TNM stage (III+IV vs. I+II; OR=4.17, 95% CI: 2.42–7.18; p=0.00001), and distant metastasis (OR=2.73, 95% CI: 1.28–5.79; p=0.01). However, there was no significant association with differentiation (poor vs. well + moderate, OR=1.45, 95% CI: 0.72–2.91) and lymph node metastasis (OR=1.39, 95% CI: 0.54–3.60). This meta-analysis showed that NEAT1 expression may be a useful biomarker for predicting a poor prognosis in patients…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,496 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free