Evidence Hub

Long non-coding RNA CRNDE in cancer prognosis: Review and meta-analysis

Haibiao Xie, Bookman Ma, Qunjun Gao, Hengji Zhan, Yu-Chen Liu, Zhi-Cong Chen, Shaobo Ye, Jianfa Li et al.

Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry, 2018

1,361 participants · 48 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colorectal neoplasia differentially expressed (CRNDE), a 1910-nt lncRNA encoded on human chromosome 16, has been found to be involved in various cancers. Nevertheless, the clinical and diagnostic values of CRNDE in tumors still need to be explored. In this review, we aimed to elucidate the clinical role of CRNDE in cancer by searching all correlative literature, and we sequentially explored the association between CRNDE levels and overall survival (OS) or clinicopathological characteristics of cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a database search of PubMed, Wanfang Data, Ovid, SinoMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science (up to January 1, 2018). The pooled odds ratio (OR) and hazard ratio (HR) were used to assess extents of correlation between CRNDE and cancer prognosis. After identification of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 12 articles including 1361 patients were selected for this review.

RESULTS

The results suggested that high levels of CRNDE were highly related to poor OS in tumor patients, with pooled HRs of 2.314 (1.894-2.826, P < .001, fixed-effects model). Likewise, we also found that high CRNDE expression was correlated with high tumor stage [OR: 3.340, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.417-4.616, P < .001, random-effects model] and lymph node metastasis (OR: 3.027, 95% CI: 2.071-4.425, P = .004, random-effects model).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrated that CRNDE may modify susceptibility for various cancers and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,361 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free