Evidence Hub

Long non-coding RNA CRNDE as a potential prognostic biomarker in solid tumors: A meta-analysis

Chao-Jie Liang, Bing Zhang, Hua Ge, Ying-Chen Xu, Guangming Li, Ji-Xiang Wu

Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry, 2018

1,570 participants · 25 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Long non-coding RNA colorectal neoplasia differentially expressed (CRNDE) has been demonstrated to be highly expressed in many malignant tumors; however, the role of CRNDE in cancer remains undetermined because of limitations in sample size. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the role of CRNDE in cancer.

METHODS

PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMBASE database, Ovid, Chinese CNKI, and Chinese WanFang database were systematically searched. The relation between CRNDE and the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of patients with cancer was determined using pooled odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Thirteen studies with 1570 patients were included. The pooled results indicated that high CRNDE expression was related to lymph node metastasis (YES vs. NO: OR = 3.50, 95% CI = [1.05, 8.09]) and TNM stage (I + II vs. III + IV: OR = 0.26, 95% CI = [0.18, 0.37]) but not to gender, tumor size, and differentiation. High CRNDE expression indicated poor overall survival (OS) (HR = 2.06, 95% CI = [1.66, 2.47]). CRNDE could be an independent predictive factor for OS (HR = 1.62, 95% CI = [1.15, 2.08]) in patients with cancer.

CONCLUSION

Therefore, high CRNDE expression was associated with advanced clinicopathological characteristics, and CRNDE could be used as a reliable prognostic biomarker in human cancer. However, more high-quality studies with a large sample size are needed to support…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,570 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free