Evidence Hub

Long non-coding RNA HULC as a potential prognostic biomarker in human cancers: a meta-analysis

Yang-Hua Fan, Miao-Jing Wu, Yuan Jiang, M. Ye, Shi-Gang Lu, Lei Wu, Xin-Gen Zhu

OncoTarget, 2017

730 participants · 16 citations

Abstract

Since the long non-coding RNA HULC (Highly Upregulated in Liver Cancer) is dysregulated in many cancers, we performed a meta-analysis to determine its prognostic potential in malignant tumors. We searched electronic databases, including PubMed, Medline, OVID, Cochrane Library and Web of Science from inception until August 14, 2016 and identified seven studies with 730 cancer patients for the meta-analysis. We analyzed the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to determine the relationship between HULC expression and overall survival (OS). We also using RevMan5.3 software to calculate odds ratio (ORs) to assess the association between HULC expression and pathological parameters, including lymph node metastasis (LNM), distant metastasis (DM) and the tumor stage. Our analysis showed that higher HULC expression was associated with OS (HR= 0.50, 95% CI: 0.35–0.70, P <0.00001), LNM (OR=0.20, 95 % CI 0.06–0.64), DM (OR=0.27, 95% CI: 0.13–0.54) and the tumor stage (OR=0.39, 95 % CI 0.25–0.64). These meta-analysis data demonstrate that higher HULC expression can be a useful prognostic biomarker in human cancers.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 730 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free