Evidence Hub

The utility of long non-coding RNA ZEB1-AS1 as a prognostic biomarker in human solid tumors: A meta-analysis

X. Zuo, Juan Cai, Zhi-Qiang Chen, Yao-Yao Zhang, Lin-Hu Liang, Jun-Feng Wang, Jin-Guo Wang, Jian Wu et al.

Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry, 2018

586 participants · 11 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis aims to assess the prognostic value of long non-coding RNA ZEB1-AS1 in human solid tumors.

METHODS

We searched the available databases up to January 2018. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to examine the prognostic impact of ZEB1-AS1 on patient survival.

RESULTS

Eight eligible studies with a total of 586 patients were enrolled. A significant association was observed between ZEB1-AS1 overexpression and poor overall survival (OS; HR = 2.195, 95% CI: 1.749-2.755) as well as unfavorable recurrence-free survival (pooled HR = 2.205, 95% CI: 1.486-3.270), and no heterogeneity was found across these studies (p = .962, I2 = 0%). Subsequent subgroup analyses showed that cancer type, sample size, follow up months, and HR estimation method did not alter the significant prognostic value of ZEB1-AS1. ZEB1-AS1 expression was indicated to be an independent prognostic factor for tumor OS (pooled HR = 2.177, 95% CI:1.545-3.069). Furthermore, we found that increased ZEB1-AS1 expression was significantly associated with tumor stage [III-IV vs. I-II: odds ratio (OR) = 1.644, 95% CI: 1.201-2.249] and lymph node metastasis (Positive vs. Negative: OR = 2.413, 95% CI: 1.504-3.873).

CONCLUSION

High expression level of ZEB1-AS1 was associated with unfavorable survival outcome for cancer patients, and ZEB1-AS1 could be used as a prognostic predictor for cancers.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 586 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free