Evidence Hub

The clinicopathological and prognostic value of long non-coding RNA ZEB1-AS1 in solid tumors: A meta-analysis

Chao-Jie Liang, Jing Liu, Hua Ge, Ying-Chen Xu, Guangming Li, Ji-Xiang Wu

Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry, 2018

861 participants · 11 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Studies have reported that Zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1 antisense 1 (ZEB1-AS1) is overexpressed in many malignant tumors. However, the sample size in those studies was limited, so the clinicopathological and prognostic value of ZEB1-AS1 in solid tumors remains undetermined, Accordingly, the aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the relationship between the expression of lncRNA ZEB1-AS1 and clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis in patients with solid tumors.

METHODS

Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated with 95% confidence interval (CI) to assess the relation between ZEB1-AS1 and the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of patients with cancer.

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies, comprising 861 patients, were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results suggested that high ZEB1-AS1 expression was related to low differentiation (low vs. high + moderate: OR = 2.99, 95% CI = [2.03, 4.39]), increased lymph node metastasis (YES vs. NO: OR = 4.62, 95% CI = [2.90, 7.37]) and advanced TNM stage (I + II vs. III + IV: OR = 0.41, 95% CI = [0.23, 0.75]), but not to gender and tumor size. Moreover, high ZEB1-AS1 expression was associated with poor overall survival (OS; HR = 1.86, 95% CI = [1.57, 2.14]) and disease-free survival (DFS; HR = 2.03, 95% CI = [1.28, 2.77]). Thus, ZEB1-AS1 could be an independent predictive factor for OS (HR = 2.07, 95% CI = [1.57, 2.56]) in patients with cancers.

CONCLUSION

High…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 861 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free