Evidence Hub

Prognostic value of long non-coding RNA ZEB1-AS1 in Chinese cancer patients

Xiaoping Zhou, Yanghua Fan, Yan Wang, Fu Wang, Yong Liu

Medicine, 2019

1,801 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Background: Aberrant expression of long non-coding RNA Zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1 antisense 1 (lncRNA ZEB1-AS1) can be detected in numerous malignancies. Therefore, a meta-analysis had been carried out in this study, aiming to examine the prognostic value of lncRNA ZEB1-AS1 in malignancies. Methods: Electronic databases, such as PubMed, OVID as well as Web of Science, had been systemically retrieved from inception to February 14th, 2019. Besides, the hazard ratios (HRs), together with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), had also been analyzed for determining the association of lncRNA ZEB1-AS1 expression with the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). In addition, the pooled odds ratios (ORs) would also be computed using the Stata SE12.0 software for evaluating the relationship of lncRNA ZEB1-AS1 expression with pathological factors. Results: A total of 21 original studies involving 1801 cancer patients had been enrolled into the current meta-analysis. As suggested by the pooled HR, high expression of lncRNA ZEB1-AS1 had displayed marked correlation with OS (HR = 2.16, 95% CI: 1.89–2.47) among cancer patients, and no significant heterogeneity was detected. Additionally, high expression of lncRNA ZEB1-AS1 was also markedly associated with RFS among cancer patients (pooled HR = 2.55, 95% CI: 1.61–4.03). Besides, the expression of lncRNA ZEB1-AS1 had displayed marked correlation with poor histological grade (PHG) (OR = 2.86, 95% CI:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,801 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free