Evidence Hub

Long non-coding RNA CASC2 in solid tumors: A meta-analysis

Chao-Jie Liang, Jinghong Zhang, Hua Ge, Ying-Chen Xu, Shulin Ren, Chao-Sen Yue, Guangming Li, Ji-Xiang Wu

Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry, 2018

1,158 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Recently, several studies have reported that the long non-coding RNA cancer susceptibility 2 (CASC2) is downregulated in human solid tumors. However, as the sample size in those studies was limited, the role of CASC2 in cancer remains unknown. Accordingly, we conducted this meta-analysis to explore the role of CASC2 in solid tumors.

METHODS

We systematically searched the PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMBASE, Ovid, Chinese CNKI, and Chinese WanFang databases. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate the relation between CASC2 and the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of patients with cancer. Additionally, we also use The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset to analyze CASC2 expression.

RESULTS

A total of 15 studies with 1158 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that the expression of CASC2 was related to tumor size (large vs. small: OR = 0.40, 95% CI = [0.30, 0.52]), differentiation (low vs. high+ moderate: OR = 0.42, 95% CI = [0.29, 0.62]) and TNM stage (I + II vs. III + IV: OR = 2.74, 95% CI = [2.08, 3.60]), but not to age, gender and differentiation. High CASC2 expression indicated better overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.41, 95% CI = [0.32, 0.50]) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 0.48, 95% CI = [0.26, 0.66]). Additionally, similar results were obtained through analysis of the TCGA data set. Moreover, it was…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,158 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free