Evidence Hub

Meta-analysis of the prognostic value of long non-coding RNA PVT1 for cancer patients

Chao Ma, Xing-Guo Nie, Yan-Li Wang, Da-Peng Wu, Qiu-dong Liang

Medicine, 2018

2,350 participants · 7 citations

Abstract

Background: Plasmacytoma variant translocation 1 (PVT1) is reported to be dysregulated in various cancers. Therefore, this meta-analysis was performed to clarify its utility as a prognosis marker in malignant tumors. Methods: Electronic databases, including PubMed, OVID, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases, were retrieved from inception to December 16, 2017. Typically, hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, so as to explore the relationship between PVT1 expression and patient survival. In addition, odds ratios (OR) were calculated to assess the association of PVT1 expression with pathological parameters. Results: A total of 23 studies involving 2350 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled HR suggested that high PVT1 expression levels were correlated with poor overall survival (OS, HR = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.73–2.28), disease-free survival (DFS, HR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.45–2.14), and recurrence-free survival (RFS, HR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.26–2.39) in cancer patients without obvious heterogeneity. Moreover, high PVT1 expression levels were also correlated with larger tumor size (OR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.02–2.11), poor differentiation grade (OR = 1.79, 95% CI: 1.39–2.30), advanced tumor stage (pooled OR = 3.28, 95% CI: 2.46–4.38), lymph node metastasis (OR = 2.67, 95% CI: 1.66–4.29) and distant metastasis (OR = 4.00, 95% CI: 1.39–11.50) in cancer patients. Conclusions: Findings of this meta-analysis suggest that a high…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,350 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free