Evidence Hub

Exosome derived from human adipose-derived stem cell improve wound healing quality: A systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical animal studies

Yuan T, Meijia L, Xinyao C, Xinyue C, Lijun H

International wound journal, 2023

31 citations

Abstract

Excellent capability of exosome derived from human adipose-derived stem cell (ADSC) manifested in improving the quality of wound healing with SMD (STD Mean Difference). However, it is still in the preclinical stage and its efficacy remains uncertain. Emphasised the need for a systematic review of preclinical studies to the validity of it in ameliorate wound healing quality which accelerate the clinical application translation. We performed a systematic literature review to identify all published controlled and intervention studies comparing exosome derived from human ADSC with placebo in animal models of wound closure during wound healing. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane were employed. Risk of bias assessed by the SYRCLE tool aimed at preclinical animal studies. Administration of exosome derived from human ADSC extremely improved wound closure compared with controls, which is primary outcome (SMD 1.423, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.137-1.709 P adipose stem cell exosomes > controls. Exosome derived from human ADSC, especially after enrichment for specific non-coding RNA, is a promising approach to improve healing efficiency.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free