Evidence Hub

PGD and heteroplasmic mitochondrial DNA point mutations: a systematic review estimating the chance of healthy offspring

Hellebrekers DM, Wolfe R, Hendrickx AT, de Coo IF, de Die CE, Geraedts JP, Chinnery PF, Smeets HJ

Human reproduction update, 2012

327 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mitochondrial disorders are often fatal multisystem disorders, partially caused by heteroplasmic mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) point mutations. Prenatal diagnosis is generally not possible for these maternally inherited mutations because of extensive variation in mutation load among embryos and the inability to accurately predict the clinical expression. The aim of this study is to investigate if PGD could be a better alternative, by investigating the existence of a minimal mutation level below which the chance of an embryo being affected is acceptably low, irrespective of the mtDNA mutation.

METHODS: We performed a systematic review of muscle mutation levels, evaluating 159 different heteroplasmic mtDNA point mutations derived from 327 unrelated patients or pedigrees, and reviewed three overrepresented mtDNA mutations (m.3243A>G, m.8344A>G and m.8993T>C/G) separately.

RESULTS: Mutation levels were included for familial mtDNA point mutations only, covering all affected (n = 195) and unaffected maternal relatives (n = 19) from 137 pedigrees. Mean muscle mutation levels were comparable between probands and affected maternal relatives, and between affected individuals with tRNA- versus protein-coding mutations. Using an estimated a priori prevalence of being affected in pedigrees of 0.477, we calculated that a 95% or higher chance of being unaffected was associated with a muscle mutation level of 18% or less. At a mutation level of 18%, the predicted probability of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 327 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free