Evidence Hub

The diagnostic and prognostic potential of extracellular vesicles as biomarkers for thyroid cancer: a systematic review

Ahmed NM, Beatson K, Patel J, Eddama MMR, Clapp LH, Abdel-Aziz T

Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany), 2025

Abstract

The incidence of thyroid cancer, the most common endocrine malignancy, has increased by 313% in the past four decades and is now the seventh most common cancer worldwide. There is an urgent need for non-invasive diagnostic, prognostic, and surveillance biomarkers to improve patient outcomes. Given the promising role of extracellular vesicles (EVs) as liquid biopsy biomarkers, a systematic review of the literature was conducted to evaluate their diagnostic and prognostic utility in thyroid cancer. We also assessed the quality of included studies giving special emphasis to methodology, reporting standards, and adherence to MISEV2018 guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted across Web of Science, Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Scopus, and Emcare for English-language studies published from inception to March 2025. Search terms included a combination of relevant keywords and subject Headings. A total of 40 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most focused on papillary thyroid carcinoma, with relatively a minority investigating follicular thyroid carcinoma. The majority examined small EVs (exosomes), with microRNAs (miRNAs) being the most studied EV biomarkers, followed by proteins, circular RNAs, long non-coding RNAs, mRNAs, DNA, procoagulant phospholipids, and biophysical characteristics. No studies investigated EV lipids or metabolites as potential thyroid cancer biomarkers. This systematic review highlights the strong potential of EVs as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free