Evidence Hub

Serum ferritin as a non-invasive prognostic biomarker in cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Chen X, Bu N, Lv Q, Zhao J

Frontiers in oncology, 2026

3,083 participants

Abstract

Purpose: Serum ferritin (SF) is a routine biomarker reflecting iron status and systemic inflammation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to validate the prognostic value of circulating SF for overall survival (OS) in adult patients with malignant tumors.

Experimental design: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, the Chinese databases CNKI and Wanfang from inception to December 31, 2025, for retrospective cohort studies reporting the association between SF levels and overall survival (OS) in cancer patients. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality via the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, with prespecified subgroup, sensitivity, and publication bias analyses. This study was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251271950).

Results: Ten moderate-to-high quality studies (3,083 patients) were included. Elevated SF was significantly associated with increased mortality risk (pooled HR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.55-2.05, P P for interaction > 0.05). We preliminarily identified a 300-500 ng/mL SF threshold as the high-risk range for adverse outcomes (exploratory analysis, 2 studies, HR = 2.26). Publication bias adjustment did not alter the core conclusion (adjusted HR = 1.70).

Conclusion: Higher SF correlates with worse OS in adult patients with both hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. Our data only offers preliminary reference for risk…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 3,083 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free