Evidence Hub

Injustice unmasked: a systematic review of social justice struggles during the COVID pandemic in Canada

Mensah C, Bodunrin S

Frontiers in public health, 2026

58 participants

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic amplified social injustices through institutional system disruption among marginalized communities in Canada. This study fills an important literature gap by providing the first holistic systematic review with a theoretically grounded framework to anticipate and mitigate social injustices in future public health crises.

Method: Using PRISMA 2020 framework and the databases of Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed (n = 58, 2020-2023), the study analyzed the pandemic-induced inequities through the PEO framework.

Results: Discrimination was identified as the most pervasive social injustice during the pandemic. Immigrants, Refugees, and Women were identified as the most vulnerable group impacted with various forms of social injustices due to the intersection between different social identities.

Discussion: The novel PISIIM framework was developed to equip policy makers, social workers, and other stakeholders in anticipating and mitigating injustices in future public health crises.

Systematic review registration: https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-2020-flow-diagram.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 58 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free