Evidence Hub

Tooth agenesis as a potential clinical indicator of colorectal cancer susceptibility: a systematic review

Hashmi AS, Ranganathan R, Vats K, Baburaj D, Sampaio P, Chauhan D, Kulsum O, Tiwari R

Frontiers in oral health, 2026

Abstract

Background: Tooth agenesis, including hypodontia and oligodontia, is one of the most common developmental dental anomalies. Emerging evidence suggests a potential association between tooth agenesis and colorectal cancer (CRC), particularly in the context of shared genetic pathways such as WNT signalling and AXIN2 mutations. However, findings across epidemiological and genetic studies remain inconsistent.

Objective: To evaluate the current evidence regarding the association between tooth agenesis and colorectal cancer, with emphasis on epidemiological trends, genetic susceptibility, and clinical implications.

Methodology: A systematic review of recent observational, cohort, and genetic studies investigating the relationship between tooth agenesis and CRC was conducted. Studies assessing prevalence, risk estimates (HR, OR), and genetic variants, particularly AXIN2 mutations were analyzed. Both statistically significant and non-significant findings were considered to provide a balanced synthesis of the literature.

Results: Recent large-scale cohort data suggest a positive association between tooth agenesis and early-onset CRC, with increased hazard ratios reported in specific age groups. Strong genetic associations have been identified between pathogenic AXIN2 variants, oligodontia, and colorectal polyposis/CRC. Conversely, some case-control studies found no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of missing teeth between CRC patients and controls. Overall,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free