Evidence Hub

Facilitators and barriers to the sustainability of universally accessible parental training interventions: a systematic qualitative review using normalization process theory

Petersen ML, Dolva HR, Strøyer de Voss S, Rasmussen IS, Pontoppidan M, Ertmann RK, Wilson P, Overbeck G

Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026

Abstract

Background: Universal parenting programmes aim to strengthen parent-child relationships and support parental well-being during the transition to parenthood. While these programmes can improve parental confidence, self-efficacy, and child social-emotional development, achieving sustained delivery in routine practice remains a major challenge. Understanding the factors that facilitate or hinder their implementation is essential for optimizing their public health impact. This review synthesizes qualitative evidence on barriers and facilitators to the implementation and sustainability of universally accessible parental training interventions.

Methods: We conducted a systematic qualitative review following PRISMA guidelines. Ten databases (PubMed, PsycInfo, SocIndex, CINAHL, Embase, Medline, Sociological Abstracts, ERIC, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched in May 2024, and updated in July 2025, for peer-reviewed qualitative studies published after 2003 in English. Studies were eligible if they evaluated universal parenting interventions in high-income countries and explored aspects of implementation or sustainability. Interventions targeting specific clinical populations were excluded. Data extraction was conducted by multiple authors, and reporting transparency was assessed using the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ). Findings were synthesized using Normalization Process Theory (NPT) to identify how interventions become embedded in practice.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free