Evidence Hub

Coding-PTMs: How to Find Optimal Code Pre-trained Models for Code Embedding in Vulnerability Detection?

Yu Zhao, Lina Gong, Zhi-Qiu Huang, Yongwei Wang, Mingqiang Wei, Fei Wu

International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, 2024

27 citations

Abstract

Vulnerability detection is garnering increasing attention in software engineering, since code vulnerabilities possibly pose significant security. Recently, reusing various code pre-trained models (e.g., CodeBERT, CodeT5, and CodeGen) has become common for code embedding without providing reasonable justifications in vulnerability detection. The premise for casually utilizing pre-trained models (PTMs) is that the code embeddings generated by different PTMs would generate a similar impact on the performance. Is that TRUE? To answer this important question, we systematically investigate the effects of code embedding generated by ten different code PTMs on the performance of vulnerability detection, and get the answer, i.e., that is NOT true. We observe that code embedding generated by various code PTMs can indeed influence the performance and selecting an embedding technique based on parameter scales and embedding dimension is not reliable. Our findings highlight the necessity of quantifying and evaluating the characteristics of code embedding generated by various code PTMs to understand the effects. To achieve this goal, we analyze the numerical representation and data distribution of code embedding generated by different PTMs to evaluate differences and characteristics. Based on these insights, we propose Coding-PTMs, a recommendation framework to assist engineers in selecting optimal code PTMs for their specific vulnerability detection tasks. Specifically, we define thirteen…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free