Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of 1.5% levofloxacin otic solution for the treatment of otitis media in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, phase III study

Masahiro Takahashi, Satoshi Iwasaki, Toshiro Kawano, R. Ikoma, Shigeru Oka, M. Terasaki, Hiroaki Sato, S. Kariya et al.

Auris, nasus, larynx, 2023

202 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 1.5% levofloxacin (LVFX) otic solution for the treatment of patients with otitis media.

METHODS

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial was conducted at 34 institutions in Japan. A total of 202 patients with chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) or acute otitis media (AOM) were randomized into either the LVFX group or placebo group. A total of 6-10 drops of 1.5% otic solution of LVFX or its matching placebo were administered in the diseased ear twice daily, in the morning and evening for up to 10 days. Images corresponding to three clinical findings-purulent otorrhea, hyperemia (redness), and granulation tissue formation in the middle ear and tympanic membrane-for each diseased ear were evaluated using digital endoscopy by a blinded central independent review committee (BICRC) at each visit after treatment administration.

RESULTS

In total, the data of 201 participants (LVFX group, 99; placebo group, 102) were analyzed. The proportion of patients with disappearance (improvement rate) of all three clinical findings at the end of treatment or discontinuation by the BICRC was 46.5% (46/99) in the LVFX group and 23.5% (24/102) in the placebo group, and the difference (95% confidence interval) between the groups was 22.0% (8.7, 34.2), with a significantly higher improvement rate in the LVFX group than in the placebo group (p = 0.001;…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 202 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free