Evidence Hub

Teaching the Tax Code: Earnings Responses to an Experiment with EITC Recipients

Raj G. Chetty, Keesler Welch, Jacob Geray

AEA Randomized Controlled Trials, 2016

19 citations

Abstract

This paper tests whether providing information about the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) affects EITC recipients' earnings decisions. We conducted a randomized experiment with 43,000 EITC recipients at H&R Block in which tax preparers gave simple, personalized information about the EITC schedule to half of their clients. We find no significant effects of information provision on earnings in the subsequent year in the full sample. Further exploration uncovers evidence of heterogeneous treatment effects on both self-employment income and wage earnings across the 1,461 tax professionals who assisted the clients involved in the experiment. We conclude that providing information about tax incentives through tax preparers does not systematically affect earnings on average. However, tax preparers may be able to influence their clients' earnings decisions by providing advice about how to respond to tax incentives.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free