Evidence Hub

Impact of Topical 0.05% Cyclosporine A Eye Drops on Post-Femtosecond-Assisted Laser In Situ Keratomileusis Ocular Surface Recovery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Lu Zhao, Hong-Yu Duan, Bai-Kai Ma, Tingting Yang, Yifan Zhou, Yilin Liu, Jiawei Chen, Yueguo Chen et al.

Eye & contact lens, 2024

33 participants · 8 citations

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the effect of topical 0.05% cyclosporine A (CsA) eye drops as an adjunct to conventional therapy in maintaining post–femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) ocular surface stability. Methods: Sixty-six patients (eyes) undergoing FS-LASIK were randomized into 2 groups: 33 patients (eyes) in group I (conventional treatment group) and 33 patients (eyes) in group II (CsA group). Conventional treatments include topical levofloxacin, fluorometholone, and artificial tears. Group II received topical 0.05% CsA eye drops twice daily for three months in addition to conventional treatment. Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), numerical rating scale (NRS), tear break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer I test (SIt), corneal fluorescein staining (CFS), conjunctival lissamine green (LG) staining, corneal sensitivity, and corneal nerve morphology were measured. In addition, tear inflammatory cytokine levels were measured using the Luminex assay. Follow-up was performed preoperatively and 1 and 3 months postoperatively. Results: In the CsA group, OSDI, TBUT, LG, corneal sensitivity, and corneal nerve fiber total branch density recovered better than in the conventional treatment group. As for tear inflammatory cytokines, interferon (INF) -γ, interleukin (IL)-10, and IL-6 levels were significantly higher in the conventional treatment group as compared with the CsA group. In addition, no significant differences in NRS, SIt, and CFS scores were observed…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 33 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free