Evidence Hub

Comparison of clinical and safety outcomes in patients with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia: a trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole versus levofloxacin monotherapy

Chien-Liang Chen, Wei-ping Chen, Feng-Yee Chang, Ching-Mei Yu, L. Siu, Ya-Sung Yang, Jung-Chung Lin, Ching-Hsun Wang

Infection, 2026

226 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

PURPOSE: The study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and safety of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) versus levofloxacin monotherapy in patients with monomicrobial Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (S. maltophilia) bacteremia.

METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult inpatients with monomicrobial S. maltophilia bacteremia at a tertiary medical center in Taiwan from January 2004 to June 2025. Patients were divided into two groups for comparison based on antibiotic treatment: TMP/SMX and levofloxacin monotherapy. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, clinical response, microbiological eradication, non-susceptible strains emergence, recurrent bacteremia, and adverse drug reactions. Multivariable logistic regression and propensity score analysis were performed using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).

RESULTS: Among 226 patients, 129 received levofloxacin and 97 received TMP/SMX. The levofloxacin-treated group was associated with lower 30-day mortality (17.8% vs. 36.1%, p = 0.002) in the primary analysis. In the multivariable logistic regression model, levofloxacin use was independently associated with improved outcomes (p = 0.047). Similarly, in the IPTW analysis, levofloxacin use remained a factor of lower 30-day mortality (p = 0.026). Additionally, microbiological eradication, emergence of non-susceptible strains, and recurrent bacteremia were comparable between the treatment groups,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 226 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free