Evidence Hub

Gain-of-Function Claims for Type-2-Diabetes-Associated Coding Variants in SLC16A11 Are Not Supported by the Experimental Data

Hoch E, Florez JC, Lander ES, Jacobs SBR

Cell reports, 2019

Abstract

Human genetic variants in SLC16A11 are associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D). We previously identified two distinct mechanisms through which co-inherited T2D-risk coding and non-coding variants disrupt SLC16A11 expression and activity, thus implicating reduced SLC16A11 function as the disease-relevant direction of effect. In a recent publication, Zhao et al. (2019a) argue that human SLC16A11 coding variants confer gain of function, basing their conclusions on phenotypic changes observed following overexpression of mutant murine Slc16a11. However, data necessary to demonstrate gain-of-function activity are not reported. Furthermore, several fundamental flaws in their experimental system-including inaccurate modeling of the human variant haplotype and expression conditions that are not physiologically relevant-prevent conclusions about T2D-risk variant effects on human physiology. This Matters Arising paper is in response to Zhao et al. (2019a), published in Cell Reports. See also the response by Zhao et al. (2019b) in this issue of Cell Reports.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a editorial / letter, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free